Dear Colleagues, I am announcing that CCB has received a change request for the RTML section from T.Tenenbaum who is representing the RTML AG. This change request relates to the effort of establishing the consistency between the latest RTML lattice design posted on the RDR wiki site and the RTML BC descriptions. The requester suggests Class 0 for this change request, and the CCB chair concurs, so it will be treated as Class 0. I have asked D.Schulte and K.Kubo to act as CCB reviewers. Now this request is brought to review by CCB, and is also open to general discussion. Any members of GDE or GDE-related task groups with comments or questions on this request, please direct them to ml-ccb@xxxxxxxxxxxx and/or ml-ext-gde@xxxxxxxxxxxx by the end of Friday, April 14, PDT. BCD is available at http://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bcd:bcd_home BCD change history is available at http://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bcd:bcd_history RDR wiki for RTML is available at http://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/doku.php?id=rdr:rdr_as:rtml_home Sincerely, - Nobu Toge (KEK, Accelerator Lab) email: toge@xxxxxxxxxxxx voice: +81-29-864-5224 fax: +81-29-864-3182
--- Begin Message ---Attached please find a revised RTML text for the Baseline Configuration Document (BCD). The requested change is Class 0.
- Subject: [CCB-275] RTML Change request
- From: Peter Tenenbaum <quarkpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:47:59 -0700
Summary: the original BCD for the RTML was based on fairly rough estimates of the system lengths, component counts, etc, since no lattice files existed at that time. Now that a first set of lattices has been completed and uploaded to the RDR wiki site, I have updated the baseline so that all of its technical information is consistent with the lattices.-PTAttachment: rtml.12apr2006.proposed.doc
Description: MS-Word document
--- End Message ---